#Make a hoplite shield full#
That might had hamstrung rome 2's post-release development slightly for the worse.īut i cant imagine any amount of analytics will ever give them the full picture either In case of rome ii, apart from the bugs i truly believe its poor player feedback like for example the anti-blobbing crowd but others as well I do understand the skepticism towards the fanbase regarding opinions on the meta game /balance decisions and thus rather reliance purely on numbers-driven intake as poor player feedback can ruin games and theres plenty of allegoric examples. With exactly this kind of justification, three kings skirmish (talking of records) progressed for the much worse and if you look up the biggest mods, none of them leave the weak skirmish untouched (as ud probably know - technological locks, upkeep, veterancy, ai difficulty and other campaign related circumstances would inevitably tilt the general player progressions)īut their blogpost suggests exactly that, that the data upon which some decisions (balance or meta) may hinge upon get extracted monolithically without further differentiation (or discrimination) #HOPLITE SHIELD INSIDE FULL#
The meta nature of the game, regarding vision and direction, which r subjective matters may be steered through data impartially 3k-records unit morale as in 1.7.0 is excellent though (on par with shogun 2 and napoleon)
0 kommentar(er)
